Drunk Driving
Cases
Attorney William C. Head
Case 1
State v. D.K.
Dekalb State Court
Decatur, Georgia
Defendant and his brother wrapped
up a July 4th outing and night of fun by dropping off three other friends
and then driving 88 mph through northern Dekalb County. A state trooper
saw the car, gave chase at speeds topping 110 mph, and obtained a Vascar
reading of 88.5 mph. After beginning to ticket Defendant, the officer
testified that he noticed the smell of an alcoholic beverage, and "asked
the Defendant if he would consent to some voluntary field tests".
At pre-trial motions hearings, I had questioned the officer about the
field sobriety tests and the "time" between the arrest and the
testing on the Intoximeter 3000. The officer testified under oath at both
the motion hearing and at trial that he had waited at the Doraville police
station for 20 minutes before testing Defendant. He testified that if
he had not done that, his breath test result would not be reliable. (Defendant
later testified that he was walked straight in to the Doraville station
and placed at the machine with no observation period.)
We subpoenaed the tow truck
records to show that the arresting officer's version was impossible, since
the trooper had also sworn that he waited for the tow truck to leave the
scene before transporting Defendant. Indeed, the tow truck records showed
the officer's signature authorizing the tow of the vehicle. Defendant's
brother (who had been a passenger) also testified that the trooper stayed
until the car was towed. The arresting officer also testified that it
took 8 to 10 minutes to get to Doraville PD from the arrest site on Peachtree
Industrial just outside I-285. A test result of 0.11% was obtained by
the arresting officer, who was a certified Intox 3000 operator. The officer
testified that he had given correct implied consent advisements, despite
the Defendant's testimony that no card was read to him at the scene at
all.
To create reasonable doubt
about the reliability of the 0.11% result, we subpoenaed Georgia State
Trooper TFC Jack Denny of the Calhoun, GA post. Denny was one of three
area (North Georgia) supervisors for the Intoximeter 3000. He trained
officers on breath testing protocol and procedure. He serviced and maintained
breath machines for the GBI. He testified that due to the lack of 20 minutes
of direct observation, that the test result was unreliable. He also stated
that the "observation" procedure followed by the arresting officer
violated training for breath testing operators. Rick Swope, of Davie,
FL, who is certified on the Intox 3000 and the Intoxilyzer 5000 confirmed
that the waiting period was absolutely essential to obtain reliable breath
test results.
We also benefited from impeachment
created by the officer testifying at the motion hearing 18 days earlier
that he turned the Defendant away from oncoming lights and the
blue strobes to do the HGN test. At trial he changed this, and under cross-examination,
admitted that he had testified falsely under oath.
To add credibility to the defense
version of the facts, we brought in three fact witnesses who testified
(1) that Defendant had consumed very little alcohol, and none at all for
more than three hours prior to the stop, (2) that Defendant had suffered
from and been medically treated for gastric problems, and that he took
prescribed medication for the stomach malady, and (3) that the Defendant
had driven more than 70 miles around Atlanta, without incident and without
speeding, prior to the 88 in a 55 that got him pulled over.
To bolster the Defendant's
personal credibility, we brought in two respected businessmen who knew
Defendant's reputation for truthfulness in the community. These character
witnesses were pillars of the community. Although brief, their testimony
established Defendant as a truthful person, compared to the trooper, who
testified forcefully and without flinching, even when he was lying under
oath.
The coup de grace came
from the subpoenaed Doraville video surveillance cameras within the
jail and outside the building, in the parking lot. This showed
the trooper driving up to the building, taking the Defendant out immediately
and walking straight to the Intoximeter 3000, where the test was administered
less than 4 minutes after arriving.
Defendant was found "not
guilty" of both the per se and the "less safe" DUI
counts. We had not challenged the speeding citation.
You can read
other cases by clicking below
Get a Free
Evaluation of your drunk driving case NOW
|